Wednesday, August 19, 2015

The Contemplative Life

"A life not examined is a life not worth living" - Socrates
"A life over-examined is a life not lived" - Mark Twain


Somewhere between these two quotes is a compromise that allows one to fully live life.   Those who spend every waking hour trying to "figure out" their life or their upbringing tend not to fully live it.  They obsess with naval-gazing and second-guessing and let life pass them by.

But on the other hand, there are others who are so caught up in their day-to-day existence that they fail to truly appreciate how precious - and ridiculous - life really is.

And one reason for both of these extremes is debt and poverty.   The man who struggles from day to day to make ends meet - whether it is the African trying to obtain sufficient calories to survive another day, or the American, trying to make enough money to pay his cell phone and cable bill - never has the time to really sit down and think about what life really means and what it is all about.

"Life is what happens while you are making plans" some folks like to say, and there is a modicum of truth to that.   Many folks are so obsessed with trying to "get ahead" that they fail to really appreciate life.   They work like dogs, eight to ten hours a day, five or six days a week (or more) to have "things" that they think will fulfill their lives.  But they are really just running on a treadmill, trying to keep ahead of the bill collectors and stay ahead of their co-workers and neighbors.

One of the major revelations I had, when I chucked it all and decided to work part-time from a home office was how little work I needed to do in order to stay solvent and alive.   Once I decided I didn't really need a fancy car to impress the other people at the office, or whatever other social climbing criteria (the smart phone, the club tie, whatever) that people seemed to need, well, it turns out the amount of money you need to make to just live is rather small.

There was a small park near our home.  No one ever visited it, although the county mowed it every week and it looked nice.  I would go there after lunch, walk the dog and let her roam off the leash - there was never anyone in the park.  I would sit underneath an old oak tree and lean against it and just enjoy the nice weather - and feel guilty that I was "doing nothing" while my cohorts who stayed in the cubicle were hard and work and scheming against one another.

It literally took months to get comfortable with the idea that it was OK to spend an hour doing nothing, and what's more, it was OK to do so.   And once I felt comfortable with the idea that the wolves were not at the door, constantly demanding loan or debt payments, I could really live my life the way I wanted to.

We are in Northern Montana.  Boy is this a flat place.  But it has its own certain beauty.   What is interesting is the realization that I could, if I chose to, sell my house and live the rest of my life, simply doing nothing and living off my savings - and traveling in our RV.   It has a certain appeal, to be sure.   But people keep bugging me to work.  And a recent report in the Journal of the Patent and Trademark Society illustrates that the number of people entering my obscure profession is declining dramatically.  In other words, a lot of people are seeking out my talent, but very few have the talents to do the job.  I decided that I needed to double my rates.  Oddly enough, business increased.

But what I really cherish, above all, is the ability to sit down and think, for a change, about what life means and where it has lead me.  That is part of the impetus that got me started writing this blog.  Yes, it is about finances, but it is also about much more.   So many folks go through life looking at each stage in life in terms of what they can buy and how much they can borrow.  They keep "busy" at work and at make-work ("I have to do errands!  I am so busy!") that they drown out the deafening silence in their lives. 

Few people have the luxury, it seems, to really do what they want to do with their lives - or even have the time to think about what they would like to do.

For example, where do you live?  If you are like me, you lived most of your life in a place where you had to work to make a living.  The idea of choosing a place to live is just not in the cards.   And many folks, when faced with such a choice, freak out.    I live on a quiet island because I chose to do so.  There was no "job" for me here.  It was just a place with little traffic, decent weather, and a low crime rate.  So, why not?

But few of us have even that choice in life.  We are locked in, we think, to obligations and debt payments.  And for what?  A closet full of clothes and credit card debt?  A fancy cell phone and a cable plan?  A new car every three years?  A house which impresses everyone and yet no one?

The debt treadmill does serve one useful purpose.  It prevents one from really thinking about life and where it leads you.  Since one becomes so obsessed with making money and paying off loans and bills, one doesn't really have any time to think about where this all leads.   It serves to drown out the silence in our lives.

And I guess for most folks, that's enough.   But not for me.

Monday, August 17, 2015

The Fracking Frontier

Saudi Arabia?  No, North Dakota.


Here in the wilds of North Dakota, the fracking boom has taken off.  It is a pretty amazing thing to see - all these oil pumps running and oil trucks racing down the road, not to mention the huge flames of the waste gas burning off at night.  It is like being in Saudi Arabia.  The rolling fields of brown wheat look like sand dunes, to complete the effect.

It is interesting to come here, and visit Theodore Roosevelt National Park, as I just got done reading Gore Vidal's Empire and James Bradley's Empire Cruise, the latter of which was on sale at the Dollar Tree for a dollar (of course) which tells you a lot about that book.  A real shame, too as Bradley's Flags of Our Fathers and Flyboys were both good reads.   Sadly, Empire Cruise relies too heavily on revisionist history - namely that Roosevelt was some sort of Aryan racist (which may or may not be true) and that was his sole motivation for expansion in Asia.   It was, however, a chilling reminder of the horrors of the Philippine occupation - where America began its love affair with waterboarding.  But I digress.

Teddy was a skinny, somewhat effeminate, asthmatic lad, and he came west to experience "The Strenuous Life" and then write about it and become famous as a (part-time) rancher and later a "rough rider" - a term he swiped from the Wild Bill Hickory rodeo show.  It must have been strenuous inheriting $12 million at age 12 and also riding all that way from New York in your private Pullman coach.  But again, I digress.

(Being a part-time rancher, or oilman, however, has been a popular sport amongst Presidents who want to shed their images as a "wimp" or elitist.   Ronald Reagan and both George Bushes relied upon "clearing brush" photo ops to enhance their images.   Roosevelt, who had a tennis court built at the White House, was famous for saying that he made sure always to be photographed on a horse or carrying a gun, but never with a tennis racket.   Something John Kerry should have realized when he went wind-surfing).

North Dakota is a beautiful and wild place still, and it is still a place where machismo rules.   And with the advent of the fracking boom, well, the place has taken off.  RV parks popped up everywhere, and many folks are living in them, or staying in hastily constructed modular hotels - some made from shipping containers.  The big crew-cab 4x4 pickup rules the road here - and for good reason.  Unlike the suburban folks who buy these rigs to overcompensate for lack of penis size, here they are actually driven off-road, haul loads (or trailers) and have "crews" in their crew cabs.  The big pickup is in its element here, and is actually functional.

It certainly has been good for the pickup truck business.   And RV business.  And all the supporting businesses, from the rowdy roadhouses to the skanky prostitutes hawking their wares in front of recently constructed motels.  New restaurants are springing up everywhere, often in modular units.   We did not try the fare at the "Bakken Buffet" (I kid you not) but a lot of other folks were.  The dusty, muddy pickups lined the parking lot.

Everything is so new, than a GPS is basically useless.  New stores, new gas stations, new roads - everything is so new that the database is outdated the moment they update it.   And a lot of people are making and spending a lot of money around here.  It is hard to imagine what these places looked like when ranching and farming was the only game in town.

And that is the sad part.    The bloom is already off the rose on fracking, at least for the time being.  With sanctions against Iran lifted, the worldwide oil glut appears poised to get worse.  $50 a barrel oil is here to stay - or perhaps far less.   The local Halliburton yard is full of idled drilling rigs, and while we saw an awful lot of pumping going on, we saw very little drilling.   Of the literally thousands of pumping sites we have seen (and we have seen only a fraction of what is going on) we've seen maybe two drilling sites.  And a number of pumping sites are idle.

Of course, there are still jobs.  Tanker truck drivers haul the oil from the fracking sites to the rail heads or pipeline terminals.  They drive back and forth all day long, retractable truck and trailer axles up when empty, down when full, putting 24-30 tires on the road with a full load (and sometimes a tandem trailer to boot).  Still nothing like the monster rigs in Northern Michigan (which have ten axles or more!) but pretty impressive nevertheless.

But even those jobs may be waning, as we saw pipes being run from site to site to accumulate oil.    Nevertheless, "Help Wanted" is still a popular sign around these parts.  The local gun shop/convenience store/gas station laments their gun shop hours are only 9-7 Mon-Sat as they don't have enough help to stay open longer.   Hard to believe people complain about being unemployed when less than a day's drive away, jobs are going unfilled!

Of course, like any boomtown, it is hard to live here.   The local modular motel wants $400 a week to stay, so that big paycheck gets eaten up pretty quickly.   Nevertheless, a lot of young bucks are striking it rich - or so they think, anyway, which is what brings us to the point of this posting.

I will leave it to others to discuss oil policy or environmental policy related to fracking.   Those issues have been well-documented.   What fascinates me is the frontier mentality going on out here.  It is like the gold rush in 1849.    A lot of people have come here to strike it rich, and they are, but are spending it faster than they are making it.    A young oil worker, when he gets his first paycheck, runs out to the Dodge dealer and buys a big Ram pickup (because the other workers laughed at his Camry).   And since he thinks this job will last a lifetime, he puts it all "on time".

Worse yet, many are settling down and buying homes, either modular, double-wide, or even stick-built.  Suburbs are springing up near some small cities, which are growing at an exponential rate.   And of course, everyone has to have a party barge, jet skis, or a new Sea Ray (to drive around the Missouri River - this is a land of water, ironically).   And again, it is all paid for "on time" based on the assumption that people will always be willing to pay $100,000 a year for unskilled labor.

But as we are seeing, the oil industry can be fickle.   We've seen booms and busts in the oil business for decades, as the price of oil peaks and valleys.   My seatmate on an United flight back in the early 1990's related to me how he just returned from Oklahoma, to bury his brother.   After the oil business peaked and crashed there, a lot of roughnecks were out of work - and many resorted to crime to stay afloat.  His brother was the victim of a home invasion, and was shot for his pickup truck.   That sort of thing hasn't happened - yet - here in North Dakota, as the oil glut is only a few months old (ironically, gas prices are very high here.  They claim it is because refineries are off-line, but I suspect the real reason is they can gouge these young roughnecks for every penny and they don't really care).

We've seen a few modular hotels already shuttered.  A new mini-mall site sits abandoned, up for sale.  A lot of dreams are starting to crash.  If oil stays low, a lot of dreams could turn into real nightmares.

We are off next to Alberta, the home of the oil sands projects.   It is the same sort of deal going down there, but with more dire environmental consequences.  By the way, we get most of our oil from Canada.  Most folks think we rely on the Middle East for oil.  We don't.  Europe and Asia does - which begs the question as to why we get into such trouble over there, to protect the oil supply of our competitors.  But again, I digress.

The sad thing for Canada, is that their economy is propped up by raping their own natural resources and then selling them for cheap to the United States, in order to keep their quasi-socialist economy running.  We long ago gave up on our longstanding dream of invading and conquering Canada - it is already a fait accompli at this point.   We take everything we want from Canada, and leave to them the messy business of governing their tiny populace.

But getting back to the point, this is a pretty crazy place up here - the last bit of the wild-west mining boomtown left in America.  There are opportunities up here galore - at least in the short-term.   If you decide to get a job in this boom market, just remember it is a boom market.  Once all the wells are drilled, the number of jobs will drop off precipitously.  And if the price of oil stays low, the whole thing could be mothballed in short order.   Don't spend the money like it will be around forever.

Come to think of it, that is pretty good advice for any job.....


Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Do It While You're Young

Once you get old, you won't be physically able to do a lot of things.   So why wait until your are old?


One negative reaction I get to this blog is the lash-out response that one should "enjoy life" by purchasing things, and if you just save up your money, what is the point?  After all, when you are old and grey, you won't be able to do much, right?

There is a nugget of truth to this and also a lot of denial.   What the people who are making this argument are saying, is that it is OK to get heavily into debt to have a lot of nice things and then work 60 hours a week to pay for them.   It really makes no sense, as you never get a chance to enjoy these things, or indeed, get more than 50 miles from where you live, as you are now tethered to a job to pay for it all.

But it is true that as you get older, you will be able to do less and less.   So it makes sense, if you want to see the world and do things, to do it while you are young.   Traveling around the country in an RV at age 70 and watching television in all 50 States really makes no sense.  You are not "seeing America" nor are you really doing anything other than existing and consuming a lot of money.

I related before about my young friends who hitch-hiked around the world - twice - before they got married.   What they did was live frugally, worked hard, and banked their paychecks.   They traveled modestly and stayed in cheap places like hostels and whatnot.   But they got to see the world at an age where long hikes and whatnot were still physically possible.  And not only that, when they got back home, they still had enough money in the bank to make a down payment on a house.

It was no secret how they did it.  They didn't have cable television.  They weren't glued to a smart phone 24 hours a day.  They drove an older Toyota they bought for $3000 and kept for many years.   They didn't spend a lot of money on restaurant meals and clothes and "shopping" and whatnot.   They set their priorities and then set out to achieve their goals.   

And the kicker is, neither had a very high-paying job.  One worked for a charity and the other in retail.

When they took off to see the world, some told them they were foolish to squander all that money and to "give up" on good jobs and lose their place in line in terms of promotions and advancement.   The folks who live the job mentality thought they were insane!   After all, you have to "play the game" and wait for your promotion so you can trade-in your Chevy for a Pontiac, right?   You have to work your way up the ladder of success, right?

Well, wrong.   The are now living overseas, happily, and have professional jobs that pay far more than they made when they were young.  And they have a happy healthy family.   And they got to do what they wanted to do in life, while young, which is great.

Sadly, many others, including their friends, felt that such a course in life was impossible.   They had "commitments" in the form of car loans and mortgages and cable television payments.  They had a nagging credit card debt that needed to be paid off.  They couldn't just pack up and leave, right?   And when they got back, they'd lose all that seniority at work!

In short, most of their friends were chained to the hamster wheel of debt, and were running as fast as they could, just to stay in place.   I know I was, to some extent.  At the time, we had a fairly expensive lifestyle, a lot of debt, a nagging credit card balance, and "obligations" that prevented us from just packing up and going.

Sure, we did travel to Japan a couple of times, but always associated with business.  And we took an RV tour around America - in a month - seeing the USA through a windshield.  But we were tied down with obligations.  And most of those obligations, if not all, were self-imposed.

Today, we take off in our RV for months at a time, and are looking forward to traveling more, while we are still somewhat young.   But it is hard, even in your 50's to do this, as it is a lot of work and stress to travel.   We can't kayak and ride as far as we used to.   We can't hike as far as we did when younger.  But at least we can do some things, still.

Being financially independent - "owning yourself" - is not just some retirement goal, but a way of life.   If you decide to chain yourself to a series of cable television, car lease, and cell phone payments, remember that it is a choice in life, not a mandate.   The "man" isn't keeping you down so much as you are selling yourself to him.

And if the idea of hitch-hiking around the world appeals to you - or starting your own business, or taking a sabbatical to write the great American novel or start a garage band or whatever - then go for it.   Make a plan, figure out how to make it happen, and then do it.   Sure, it may seem that your "obligations" are preventing you from doing what you want to.   But think long and hard about who made those obligations - you or others?   Odds are, it was you who signed that contract, loan agreement or whatever, that now binds you to a desk.

Do it while you're young.  All the oldsters we meet say the same thing.   They enjoy traveling and seeing different things, but only wished they had done so while they were more ambulatory.

Thursday, August 6, 2015

How Will Self-Driving Cars Change Our World (The Conundrum of Automation)

What happens to the millions of people who make a living driving vehicles, when vehicles become self-driving?



Driving across America, it strikes you how many people are employed in the business of driving vehicles.  Truck drivers must number in the millions, as there are trucks going everywhere - from long-haul freight to local delivery.  Taxi drivers, delivery drivers, and so forth - a lot of people make a living behind the wheel.

And these kinds of jobs were always the last refuge for folks who had no other skills or choices.  Recent immigrants to the US tend to gravitate toward the taxi business for some reason - even though they have no language skills and don't know their way around the city they have been transplanted to.   Driving a truck is a job that you can always get, if you have a clean license.  Even a ex-con can get a job driving, in some cases.

And beyond cars and trucks, there are vehicles like fork lifts (many of which are already automated), bulldozers, rollers, graders, and other construction equipment.  We fly drones remotely already.  Why would we need pilots?   The routine operation of machinery is becoming more and more automated.

What happens if self-driving cars become a reality - which they appear ready to do?  How many millions of people will be thrown out of work?

It is a scary thought.   Add to that all the service jobs related to drivers - truckstop workers, roadside restaurants, even the strip clubs.  And what about the cops who hand out speeding tickets?   Not a lot to do when robotic cars all drive the same, regulated speed.

It is a problem we have faced, with technology, for over a century.   A new technology comes along and suddenly, it takes half the number of people -  or 1/10th - to do the same job as before.   Sure, new jobs come along - usually repairing the machines that replaced the old jobs.  But the number of high-skill repair jobs often is a fraction of the low-skill jobs they replaced.

The trucking industry is already seeing this, with the advent of Intermodal transportation.   In the old days, boxes of goods came to the US by ship (or left!) and were manhandled and pilfered by stevedores with grappling hooks.  These were loaded into box cars or trucks and shipped - being loaded and handled at each step of the process.

Today, containers are loaded at a factory and then sent by rail, truck, or ship, without ever being opened and unloaded.  One crane can move an entire container from ship to rail to truck, in a matter of seconds - replacing at least a dozen men who would have taken far longer to do the same task.

Moreover, the use of containers and piggyback rail has meant that the old job of "long haul" trucking is going by the wayside.   Why pay someone to drive from California to Florida with a load (and pay for all that diesel fuel) when you can put the container on a BNSF train and have it there is about the same amount of time for 1/10th the cost?

It is progress, to be sure, but it means that a lot of menial jobs are eliminated.

And this should be a good thing, one would think.   If all the menial labor in the world was automated, we would all have so much free time to do more esoteric things, while robots did all our work.  And with all this automation, well, we'd all be rich - as the cost of products went further and further down.

And perhaps, in part, this is coming true today.  But it also means there are a lot of people out there with no job skills or obsolete job skills with nothing to do with their time, other than to vie for the few remaining service-sector jobs out there.

Remember when I reported on the Kiosks that McDonald's that I saw being use in France?  Well, it appears they are finally making their way over here - in time to meet the $15 minimum wage.   Raise wages and costs far enough, and the impetus for automation becomes even stronger.  Catch-22.

Of course McDonald's is saying the kiosks are being used to "increase consumer choice" and allow for better service - not merely to cut costs.  Of course.   But you won't pay $10 for a Big Mac.  Fast food is already overpriced as it is.

Automation arguably is one reason our society is increasingly being divided into the haves and have-nots.  If you can design or repair the automated equipment, you have a job.  If you run the company or provide the financing to create this new technology, you can become embarrassingly rich.   If you have not job skills, on the other hand, you will be sentenced to a life of penury.

There are alternatives, of course.   We could create make-work jobs like the Japanese "elevator ladies" who push buttons for you, on an otherwise fully automated elevator.  Perhaps truck drivers will still ride along in their rigs, playing video games and watching porn, while the google robot does the steering.   The problem with that model is that it eliminates any benefit from automation, other than increased safety.

Another idea would be to simply have fewer people around since we need fewer jobs.   But of course, this is not a feasible solution, as 99% of the world believes that creating as many babies as possible is God's will, and on a personal level, want to squirt out as many as possible.   And of course, the further down the food-chain you go, the more children they are likely to have.   

In other words, we are destined to have a whole lot more have-nots in the near future, as more and more jobs are eliminated, and a whole lot more stupid people are brought into the world.  It is the March of the Morons, as predicted.

It is an interesting conundrum.    And one that I am not too worried about as by the time this technology becomes reality, I will be well-poised to shuffle off the mortal coil.   But the next generation will have to grapple with these issues, and decide whether automation will create a utopia that we could only dream about today, or a dystopian nightmare of staggering proportions.

How Camping Has Changed - Our Affluent Lifestyle



If young people today had to live the lifestyle of their parents at their age, there would be a revolt.

We just returned from an Army Corps of Engineer campground, which are very nice and inexpensive.  What was interesting was that a host of young folks in their 30's arrived - with kids in tow - driving enormous monster trucks, towing even more enormous quadruple-slide 40-foot 5th wheel travel trailers.  

Whatever you've heard about how "bad the economy is" forgetabout it.   There are a lot of wealthy people in this country.   Funny thing is, you ask one of these 30-somethings, who has three kids, a huge travel trailer, a monster truck and an SUV towing a bass-boat, they will tell you they feel "oppressed" under the "Obama Regime"   According to them, their economic situation is dire and the wolves are at the door.

This got me to thinking about how camping has changed - and our expectations in life in general have changed.   Back in the 1950's and 1960's, a family might go camping in the family station wagon - towing nothing, with a Sears tent and a few sleeping bags.   Dad built a fire and the kids roasted hot dogs.   Mom made meals and the exciting activity of the day was a hike - which involved walking.  No golf carts or jet skis.

Oh sure, there might be a few people who went high-dollar and got one of those pop-up campers.  Maybe Grandma and Grandpa, who were retired, decided to put on the dog and buy a Serro Scotty "canned ham" travel trailer.  And there were a few ostentatious people who had an Airstream travel trailer or one of those Winnebago motor homes.   But camping was a lot simpler then, and if you go to older State and National Parks (like on the Blue Ridge Parkway) you see this reflected in how small and primitive the sites are - not nearly large enough to accommodate today's big-rigs.   Not only is electrical service expected today, but a simple 20A, 110V plug won't cut it.   50 Amps of 220V electricity is needed - the level of service that powered my first house.

Today, young folks show up in huge campers and hook up the satellite television so the kids can sit indoors and watch TeeVee, when they are not tubing or jet-skiing.   Around every mealtime, they all pile into multiple vehicles (because Mom drives her SUV towing the ski boat, behind Dad towing the portable house) and they go to a restaurant to have breakfast, lunch, and dinner.   Cooking hot dogs on a stick?  Simply not in the equation.   S'mores is now a flavor of ice cream, not something you make over the fire.

Some folks even have pizza delivered to their campsite.  No, really, I am not making this shit up.

"Roughing it" has changed its meaning over the years.

I think back to the 1960's when I was a kid and also to my siblings' experience in the 1950's.  We had one tiny black-and-white television for the whole family, that might get three channels on a good day, plus some fuzzy communist UHF crap called "public TV" when the weather was just right.   It was a big day, I am sure, when my parents bought a second car.   Today, most families have three or four, and many "struggling middle class" kids expect a brand-new car when they turn 16.

Our lifestyle has changed over the years.   We have become a much more affluent country, and we haven't stopped to bother to appreciate it or be thankful for it. It is only when we feel that something is being "taken away" that we get outraged at the injustice of it all.  After all, we are used to having so many toys in our lives.  And you know what happens to brats when you take their toys away - they scream bloody murder.

The problem is, of course, the 30-somethings I met in the campground with the amazing array of motorized accessories were financing it all on monthly payments.   They had a good job at the mill or maybe the fracking fields, and were getting paid very well for the level of work they were doing.  So they took out loans over 10, 20, or even 30 years, based on the premise that a heavy machine operator will always be making a six-figure salary, even when oil goes down to $50 a barrel.

And when that happens, well, it will get ugly, really quickly.

You know, maybe camping in a tent wasn't so awful after all.   And maybe having money in the bank is a better deal than having shiny things.

Portable WiFi Hotspots

Getting Internet on the go is a lot easier with a portable WiFi hotspot like this Verizon Ellipsis Jetpack.


I noted in another posting that WiFi seems to be dying out.   It is still around, of course, but increasingly, it is being used like bluetooth - to connect personal devices with other personal devices.  The idea of "free WiFi" or free Internet seems to be fading fast.  And of course, the reason is simple - there is no profit in providing things for free.  And when something is free, no one cherishes it and they tend to abuse it.   Go to a campground or coffee shop offering free WiFi, and some jerk is streaming "Gone With the Wind" or Skyping Bosnia - and dragging down the speed of the whole network, if not crashing it.

Of course, if you have a smart phone, you may have your own WiFi hub.  Many folks don't even realize this - and they pay an extra $30 a month for the service.  But you can, with most smart phones, link your laptop or other device via WiFi and then access the Internet.  Fewer and fewer people are interested in this, though, as "Mobile" Internet is starting to take over.   Snopes is the latest victim of this craze - changing their entire website to a ".m" format so idiots with smart phones (carrying their brains around in a box) can access the site to see if the latest Facebook outrage is true or not (it isn't, of course.  If it's on Facebook, odds are, it's made-up).

The problem with smart phones as WiFi hotspots is that many are limited to very low data quotas - a GB or two perhaps.  Others claim to offer "unlimited" data packaged, but once you go over 1.6 GB or whatever, they slow the data to dial-up modem speeds (and since all websites are now overwrought with graphics and tracking software, they basically will never load at all).

But some of us, of course, don't have smart phones and are loathe to become one of the hoards of people waking around staring at a small box all the time.   I can't tell you how it feels - like I landed on an alien planet or the Invasion of the Body Snatchers.  And of course, the texting-while-driving thing is ridiculous.  We all say "Don't text and drive!" but assume that applies to the other asshole who gets into a wreck and kills a busload of school children.  But I digress.

Anyway, it is handy to be able to access the Internet while traveling.  For some reason, clients sense when you are going to go on vacation and after being silent for months on end, decide that right now is the best time to have a crises.   I don't know why this is, but it is predictable.  If you run a company and business is slow, may I suggest you take a vacation?   You will be overwhelmed with work the moment you pack a suitcase and head out the door.

A couple of years ago, I bought my first hotspot at Wal-Mart.  It was on the misleadingly named "T-Mobile" network, which is a network for people who want a cell phone, but never leave home.  To say their coverage is spotty is an understatement.   The hotspot devices are all about the same and are cheap enough (cost no doubt subsidized by the company selling airtime).   It worked OK for a couple of months of the year when I wanted it.  They had a plan for three months as I recall.

However, this year, the rates went up and you had to buy a month's worth of usage at a time or sign an annual contract.   I pre-paid for a month's worth of "service" which I put in quotes, because I basically just threw away $30.   Why is this?  Well after a long time on musical hold and being shunted from a call center in India to a "tech" in America, I learned that T-Mobile will not let you "roam" with a pre-paid plan anymore, but instead limits you to connections directly to a T-Mobile tower.   Well, perhaps I should say the T-Mobile tower, which I think is in the parking lot next to their world headquarters.

Even with a cell phone amplifier (the T-Mobile hotspot did have an external antenna connection) getting a connection to the T-Mobil network was hard.   And even when it did connect, it did not connect at 4G, 3G, or even 2G, but rather at "E" which is basically Emergency use only.   In other words, little more than dialup speeds.

I went back to Wal-Mart and they no longer sell the T-Mobile hotspot.  I wonder why.   Verizon has one (see link to review above) and it was a little more money - and they want a LOT more money for service) but since their signal strength is so good, it was worthwhile.  I think 3GB a month is like $60 and 10GB (which is hard to reach, even downloading Patents) is $90.  That's a lot of money to connect to the Internet, but if you don't want to sign an annual contract and need only a month's service, it is a lot cheaper.

The Jetpack has no external antenna plug, but it is not really needed, as Verizon has pretty decent service all over the place.   But the cost of the service is somewhat staggering.   On the other hand, with "free" WiFi either dying on the vine, we don't have much choice, if we want to stay connected to the Internet.

I suppose someday I'll have to get one of these goddamn smart phones.   But I hope that will still be years away, and that I don't turn into one of these compulsive texting and twittering jerks who walk around staring at their phones.   But the way the system is set up, increasingly, one is punished for not having texting ability and in short order, for not having a smart phone.

Monday, August 3, 2015

Why Do We Feel So Put Upon (Watching Television)?


People in America are quick to tell you how bad they have things.  Yet we are among the wealthiest people on the planet.  Isn't it a bit obscene to complain while at the all-you-can-eat buffet while others are starving?  You bet.

Traveling across America by RV, there is no shortage of people you meet willing to complain about how rotten life is for them.   A lady working at Wal-Mart whines that when she has the oil changed on her big-dually quad-cab 3/4 ton pickup, she has to pay extra because it takes 15 quarts of oil for the diesel engine.

I stand there and marvel at the irony of it all.  A woman working a low-wage job at a retailer "needs" a 7,000 lbs pickup truck the size of my house, in order to commute to work.   But then I realized that she weighed 350lbs and her husband weighed 400 lbs and with the entire family, well, 3/4 ton capacity was simply not enough to haul them and their groceries.   Thank God they are not among America's "hungry" although they do get a little peckish around 3:30 every afternoon.  Fortunately, the McDonald's in the Wal-Mart has 350 calorie "snack wraps" you can nibble on between meals.

OK, so maybe I am a bit fed up.   I've had enough of whiny Americans - who want it all and want to blame 'the gubment' for everything that goes wrong in their lives.  And by "go wrong" I mean their credit card debts and jet-ski loans.  We have become a nation of weaklings, it seems.   And the first person who comes along and tells us "it's not your fault!" we will vote for.

It scares me.   Why?  Well, simply stated, we have it so well here in the United States of America - often at the expense of the rest of the world.  And if this isn't good enough, well, nothing ever will be.   On the Right, I hear from folks who tell me that Obama is taking away all their money from the non-existent taxes they pay (most lower class people and retirees pay little or no taxes).  On the Left, we are told the "1%'ers" are taking away all our money through "income equality".   Neither are happy with what they have - which is an awful lot, if you stop to think about it.

The fellow complaining about Obama taking "all his money" has a huge monster truck and a 40 foot 5th wheel travel trailer.   And he is not some weird anomaly.  All through the Midwest (or anywhere in the US) are huge lots selling such RVs.  Despite how "rotten" our economy is, an awful lot of these rigs are sold, and an awful lot more are going down the road every day.

The Leftist who bends my ear about income inequality has to interrupt the conversation to answer texts on his new iPhone.  And of course, he (or she) sports about $5000 in tattoos and piercings (if not more).  Of course, he is not concerned for himself, but for the "little people" who he is fighting for.  You know, that factory worker who voted for Romney and complains that Obama is "taking all his money".

I sort of have reached my limit on this.  The next person who steps out of his $100,000 RV and tells me how rotten he has it, gets smacked across the face.  OK, maybe just in my imagination.   But pray tell, where do folks like this come from?

Well, the answer is simple and in two parts.  First, it is human nature.  No matter how bad things get or how good they get, people whine about how bad they have it.  We adapt to our environment and what seems like the ultimate luxury at first glance, seems to be plebeian trash upon repetition.  When the New York City subway system first opened, people boarded it in the morning, oohing and aahing over this marvelous new technology.   However, as reporters at the time noted, by that afternoon, jaded New Yorkers acted as though riding the subway was nothing special - something they had done all their lives.  And no doubt, they were already picking at the flaws in the system. It is human nature.

The second part of the problem is television.   There are vested interests in this country who want you to feel put upon, no matter how good things get.  In fact, the better things are, the more they want you to feel put upon.  And yes, I am talking about Fox News.  It ain't hard to spot a chronic Fox New watcher.  They will bend your ear for hours about how rotten things are and how worse they are going to get.   I met one recently and he tried to convince me that the Civil War was fought by the North through the use of Hessian mercenaries.  Clearly he had been fed some line in relation to the current "controversy" about Confederate battle flags.  The truth, of course, can be found in the war memorials in every small town and village throughout the Northeast - to the volunteers who set out to preserve the union and abolish slavery.

But no, that doesn't fit the story line told by the television - which tries to re-write history at the same time.  The Civil War wasn't about slavery.  No, no, it was about "States' Rights" - the right to hold slaves (in 1865) or the right to enforce segregation (in 1955).  For some odd reason, whenever "States' Rights" are brought up, black folks seem to get the short end of the stick.  But once again, I digress.

The reality is, in this country, we are well fed and have an over-abundance of overpowered internal combustion vehicles, nice houses, and electronic toys - all the better to tweet and text how awful it all is.   We fly our rebel flags in protest - from the beds of our 10 mpg pickup trucks.  And the irony seems to be lost on most of us.

The reality of our situation is this:  We are a remarkably wealthy country, regardless of the ravages of Obamacare or Income Inequality.  The real problem, for most Middle-class Americans isn't the external forces oppressing them, but the financial stress they put themselves under, in order to have all the "things" they decide they have to have.  We trade real wealth for apparent wealth.  We trade money in the bank for a "rewards" platinum card.  We borrow when we should save.  And we blame others when it goes horribly wrong.

And sadly, few people in the US see it this way.  The reason for our problems isn't our own malfeasance, but the actions of others.  And until this mindset changes, nothing will change for the better.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

The Lemon


Are cars really lemons, or are people just generally unhappy?

We are staying in an Army Corps of Engineers campground in Southern Wisconsin, along the mighty Mississippi river.   A fellow next to us has one of these very expensive motorhomes and on the front he has a professionally made sign saying "Ask me how (manufacturer name) treated me!" with a picture of a lemon with four wheels.

I felt bad for the guy as it must suck to go around so unhappy and bitter all the time.  When pressed for details as to what was actually wrong with the unit, he raised a number of trivial concerns - pieces of trim falling off, and the like.  The reality is, of course, that he had buyer's remorse and regretted spending the money on the coach - and was probably upside down on the loan.

I was talking to another neighbor, and he related how, years ago, he did the same thing, with both a Chevrolet and a Volkswagen - sitting out by the dealership with yellow balloons tied to the car and huge signs saying "don't buy this car, it's a lemon!"   I told him I was glad I did not know him then.

In the second instance, this degraded into a fistfight with the sales manager, which was not a good idea.

On the Chevrolet, he put a license plate "LEMNCHVY" on it and kept a sign taped to the window listing his grievances against GM.   Several years later, his mechanic asked him, "what was wrong with that car, anyway?   I see you driving it every day to work!  For an unreliable car, it is awfully reliable!"   And the mechanic had a point.

What makes people do these things?  And is this a good way to get consumer "justice"?  The answer to the second is a clear "NO" on many levels.  On BMW discussion groups, I see this all the time.  Someone posts a message saying they are having trouble with their car.   They post in a reasonable tone and set forth the facts.  In some cases, a response is posted by BMW NA, saying, "please contact us to resolve this issue."

Others start off by bashing BMWs and saying what crappy cars they are.   As you might imagine, this doesn't go anywhere.  The company isn't about to do anything in the interest of "consumer satisfaction" when the consumer clearly will never be satisfied.   Trashing the reputation of a company online is a one-way street.  Once you've pulled the trigger on slander, they have no interest in helping you.

And often the real reasons behind this customer discontent are based more on buyer's remorse - the feeling they paid too much for a car, bought the wrong model, or whatnot.   They pick at imagined flaws in the vehicle or exaggerate small problems into big ones.

My neighbor ended up having the Volkswagen taken back under the "Lemon Law" and ended up buying another one - from another dealer.  The first dealer refused to sell him any more cars.   The second car was a different model - the model he decided he really wanted after buying the first one.   I wonder if the real issue wasn't the imagined "defects" in the car so much  as it was a desire to get out from under loan payments and into a different car.

With the Chevy, well, they did some repairs and whatnot, but he was never happy.   But as his mechanic pointed out, he drove it to work every day for years, so what was the problem, again?

In both cases, the issues were resolved not by painting lemons on the car and protesting, but by going through channels and procedures (calling the zone office, documenting problems, writing letters, etc.).   Lemon law processes don't require you sit outside the dealer on weekends with large signs making a fool of yourself.  In fact, while you might find some sort of cathartic release from this, it really works against your own interests, as it allows the dealer and manufacturer to rightly paint you as an unreasonable person.   Who in their right mind wastes a perfectly good weekend doing stupid stuff like protesting a car dealer?

(By the way, the "lemon" car they bought back from him was serviced and then re-sold to someone else as a used car.  Despite what some people say, there is no such thing as an unfixable car.   Cars are not haunted by ghosts!)

Sadly, this sort of behavior extends to all walks of life.  While getting our replacement GoPhones at the AT&T store (they asked us to stop using our Motorola phones, as they were slowing down the network), a young man and his wife came in all fuming over their new iPhones.  It seems there wasn't very good service in the trailer park where they lived and they wanted their money back.   But as the salesman explained, all sales are final, and cell service levels are not an excuse to duck out of a contract that has been carefully crafted by devious lawyers.

The real issue, of course, wasn't cell service levels.  The real issue was that he was paying $175 a month for two smart phones and realized that having a smart phone wasn't as great as he thought it was, and moreover, his limited income could be spent in better ways - like putting a muffler on the clapped-out truck he drove in.   Buyer's remorse, once again.

We all suffer from this to some extent.   We have a nagging feeling we paid too much for a product - often a product we bought out of pride, to show off, and only later realizing that we've signed ourselves up for five years of onerous payments.   The young man buys a shiny new car based on emotions, and only later realizes that the cost of insurance is literally bankrupting him. So it must be the car's fault, right?

The easiest and best way to avoid this trap is to own less crap and desire less crap.   You can't be angry about a product you bought being "defective" if you don't buy it.   But of course, we all need some crap in our lives - a car, a computer, a cell phone (or do we?).   One way to minimize discontent is to buy a cheaper model or the least product you need.

I am never unhappy with our Casita camper as we paid $8500 for it, and it is 16 years old (and has given us a decade of good service).    I can't complain about our cheap Japanese pickup truck, as it cost only about $25,000 - compared to the $45,000 people are paying these days for an F-150.   It may have its flaws, but it didn't cost much, so I tend to overlook them more.  When you feel you got a screaming bargain, you complain less about small problems.

When you pay top dollar for "top of the line" vehicles, you tend to get disappointed when they don't live up to their overblown reputations.  And the same is true for any other piece of equipment, or even service.   My friend who spent $2000 on his MacBook is all pissed off when the hard drive crashes.   For $2000, these shouldn't break!   My used Toshiba ($155 on eBay) on the other hand is pretty reliable.   Well, when it isn't, I am not so upset, as I paid nothing for it (and parts are cheap on eBay).   My satisfaction with the product is so much higher, as my expectations are so much lower.

And this is true in any product ranges as well.  My "lemon" friend with the Chevy and Volkswagen bought cheap cars, it is true.  But at the time, he was pretty poor, and could ill-afford to buy a brand-new car - even a cheap one.   So his expectations were higher, and he was disappointed when a cheap car turned out to be cheap (and the cost of ownership was higher than he had expected).

This rule applies even to trivial things.  You buy a cup of coffee at a gas station and it tastes like brown water.  You don't go back and complain, as you paid 99 cents for it.   But if the "barista" at Starbucks screws up your Mocha-double-tall-latte with half decaf and half 2% foam, you scream his bloody head off.  You have higher expectations and they rarely are met.   The best bet, of course, it to find something in-between - a decent cup of coffee that isn't too fancy, at a good price.  Or decide you don't need coffee that badly, which is probably the best choice.   You can't be disappointed if you don't buy.

But when things don't work out in life, don't be that guy with the signs on his car, "protesting" the car dealership.    Avoid the problem by buying less stuff than you think you need - and avoiding status purchases entirely.   And if something really is wrong (as opposed to made-up, inflated, or exaggerated problems - and honest with yourself here) document everything and take it to the service manager and ask to escalate the issue to a zone manager.  If the problem is chronic and real, then investigate invoking the lemon laws in your jurisdiction.
But painting lemons on the car?  Probably a bad choice,.   



Thursday, July 30, 2015

The Wal-Mart Lifestyle, Revisited

Living La Vida Wal-Mart!


I was talking with a lady the other day and she made a very odd comment to me.  She mentioned that where she grew up, in a modest middle-class neighborhood, there was a family living on the street who was fairly wealthy, but chose to live in a middle-class neighborhood and drive plebeian Chevies like all of their neighbors.  "We hated them," she said, "stooping to our level of living!"

Of course, to my mind, they were smart folks - having money (apparently - how would others know?) but instead of "moving up" to a nicer house and fancier car, decided to live the very comfortable middle-class lifestyle that we have in America and then bank the rest of their money.  

That's cheating, of course.  In America, we are supposed to not only spend up to our income level, but borrow even more to go to the next level.  And our entire society is structured around this belief system.  The wealthy couple living in middle-class suburbia were literally heretics.

General Motors used to have a saying (back in the Sloane days) "a car for every purse and purpose".  You were supposed to start out in life with a Chevy - maybe an "OK Used Car" from the local Chevy dealer and then work your way up the chain, trading every three years, from Chevy, to Pontiac, to Oldsmobile, to Buick, and then - if you were lucky or retiring - a Cadillac.

As you worked your way up from the mailroom to the executive suite, you were supposed to buy a bigger house, fancier clothes, country club memberships, and of course a fur for the wife.  It was the American dream - a sign you had "made it".

Since we lived in a society where you pledged loyalty to one company for life - and they provided you with a pension based on your income - the name of the game was to spend as fast as you made it - and borrow a dollar more.  You worked your way up the ladder, one run at a time.

But of course, since those days, the rules changed.  And they changed in 1978 when laws were passed creating our present IRA/401(k) system, and suddenly, you had to be an investor and not a consumer anymore.   But no one called down to bar and explained this to the great masses, who were still interested in impressing the neighbors with a stainless steel refrigerator or one of those fancy new front-load washers.

The thing about the "ladder" view of life is that while you may spend more - a lot more - on upscale accessories for your life, you really don't get a corresponding amount of value as a result.  As I learned the hard way with BMWs, and by watching my friends with their Mercedes, you can spend 3-4 times as much on a car and only get maybe 1.5 times as much car.  Certainly you don't get a car that lasts 3-4 times as long, or even as long as a more plebeian Toyota.

The name of the game, therefore is to go after value not status.   And what you realize after shopping around is that spending a lot of money on stuff that costs 3-5 times as much as what they are selling at Wal-Mart (often the exact same products) is stupid.   Granted, there are some things in life worth spending more money on.  But not all things.    A box of crackers from the upscale supermarket is $6.  It is $1.99 at Wally World.  Same damn box.

But yet there are those who think they are "too good" to shop at Wal-Mart or Dollar Tree.   They have bought into the ladder view of life and think at their income level, they are entitled to and should shop at a certain class of store.   And this sort of thinking is nothing new, as I have noted before.  In the small town I grew up in, my Mother always shopped at the small IGA (which had higher prices) rather than the cheaper A&P (on the poor side of town).   It was food shopping based on status alone.

But like the family I mentioned at the start of this piece, there is a way around this sort of nonsense.  If you can live a nice comfortable middle-class existence, while your income climbs in life, you can accumulate wealth rather than spend it faster than you make it.  The temptation is, once you get that good-paying job, to take a quick trip to the Lexus dealer to show all the other plebes that you've "made it" finally.  But in reality, you are not "making it" but increasing your level of squander to match your increased income.

I try to live the Wal-Mart lifestyle.  And quite frankly, it ain't all that bad.  All the crap you own in your life, from your big-screen TeeVee to your iPhone 6, they sell at Wal-Mart - for a lot less money that you'd pay at other places.   And at the Dollar Tree, well, they have some nice stuff (and some real shit) but it's all a buck.   Why spend more to have about the same?

And why buy a fancy car when a regular kind works just as well - particularly these days when all cars are made from the same parts and sometimes on the same assembly lines?

For the very poor, of course, there is no choice.  But often, these are the folks who crave "upscale" goods the most - and pay the highest possible prices, using credit or rent-to-own schemes.   But the types of goods we may look down on as "plebeian" are often quite well made and ironically more reliable than upscale goods.  GM made millions of their J-body cars such as the Cavalier.   BMW made 300,000 of their Z3 roadsters.  Guess which is a more reliable car?

For me, the bonus is that by living below my income level, not only do I accumulate wealth, but I can afford not to work if I don't have to.   And not working and not being constantly beholden to others, well, that is the greatest luxury that I can think of.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

A tale of two Hamsters

The people least likely to afford a new car buy them

Since I started writing this blog, my financial situation has changed for the better.  Mostly it was a matter of learning to live without a lot of things I thought I "needed" - the hobby cars, boats, vacation home, antique tractor and whatnot.  But on every economic level, the story is the same.  The fellow living in a trailer laments he cannot pay off his $5000 in credit card debt, but at the same time saying, "I'll never sell my Harley!"   Very few of us are stressed by necessary debt.

We decided to sell our last BMW - a 1999 M Roadster with 55,000 miles on the clock.  It is largely in original as-new condition, with some small nicks and dings, but otherwise a serviceable car.  Why get rid of it?

Well, to begin with, it is a fast car and we live on an island with a speed limit of 35 mph.  It also is very hard to get in and out of, particularly as you get older.  In fact, that was why the original owner sold it to me, with 7,000 miles on the clock, after four years of non-use.  It also is loud, particularly at highway speeds, as there is little soundproofing in the M model and very large and wide and (noisy) tires.

The air conditioning never worked quite right - a trait typical of BMWs for some reason.  While it performed adequately at highway speed, at stoplights, it could turn into a sauna.  Yes it was fun.  But one gets tired of driving a "look at me!" car, particularly when every jackass kid in a Hyundai tries to race you from every stoplight.

In retrospect, we probably should have kept one of the E36 cabrios instead, even though they had more miles on them.  A slightly more practical car, with a trunk that holds more than just your wallet.

The problem with the car was that it was so unpleasant to drive and so impractical that every time we went somewhere - even to buy groceries - we took the truck, as it would actually hold things and people.   So the roadster ended up with fewer and fewer miles on it.

We looked at some small wagons and the like.  The VW Golf "sportwagon" (which used to be called the Jetta) looked nice, but it was rather expensive, even in plebian trim.  And no, I am not interested in saving 1/10th of an MPG by going to a diesel.  It just isn't a cost-effective proposition.

The BMW/Mini looked appealing, but the wagon-like clubman was discontinued this year (coming back next year).  The base engine in the 4-door mini is a 3-cylinder (!) BMW engine with a turbocharger.  What could possibly go wrong with that?   In the larger bloated "countryman" the base engine is a Peugeot 4-cylinder turbo, which sounds like a nightmare of hard-to-find parts and esoteric failure modes.   At least Mini no longer offers a CVT. 

It was cute, but it was a British-built BMW - sort of the worst of both worlds.   And it was crowded and cramped, and very easy to slam your hand in the hood, with its odd round headlight openings.  No thanks.  No more BMWs!

Our neighbor has a Hamster - a Kia Soul.  The car was made famous by its original "Hamster" adverts, which were clever and funny - but deemed too "ethnic" (read: black).  The subsequent Hamster videos were suitably sanitized and made more Caucasian - and even put on a diet (skinny Hamsters - go figure).

But the basic vehicle is what we are looking for - a small wagon that is easy to get in and out of, and easy to drive and park, gets reasonable gas mileage (30 mpg) and doesn't cost a lot. The  Hamsters sell for about $15,000 to $25,000 from stripped 6-speed with a 1.8 liter four to a loaded 2.0 liter four with a panoramic sunroof and air-conditioned seats.  No turbos.  No diesels.  Just a basic engine.

I could afford to buy one and write a check and not care, really.  Oh, and the warranty is far better than the BMW/Mini.  100,000 miles on the drivetrain.

So I called around and looked at a few.  Most are stripped models being sold to the younger set on payment terms - or leased.  I went online to some discussion forums and was chagrined to read postings by several youngsters (in their 20's) who were on their second or third leased Hamster.  Talk about throwing money away!

I met a young lady working at a retail job in a sandwich shop.  She liked her Hamster, but lamented that she wished she hadn't such lousy credit as, "I ended up paying twice for it, with interest and all".   That was a sad comment to me, as she paid about $30,000 for a $15,000 Hamster, financing it at high interest rates.

In short, she would pay more for a stripped Hamster (likely used) that I would pay for a brand-new one.  And the kicker is, they are offering that 0% financing on top of it (with the rebate) - but only for someone with a 770 credit score or higher.

In other words, when you don't need a good deal, you get one.  When you desperately need a break in life, they throw shit in your face.  Louis CK, who you either love or hate (or love and hate at the same time) sort of nailed this many years back in this video:

 Ever been so broke the bank charges you money for being broke?  Yea, we've all been there.

He makes a good point, and one that I have tried to make here, again and again.  And that is this:  If you go through life living in the margins, bouncing checks and late on bills, you will get hammered again and again by our system, which is akin to throwing gasoline on the fire of debt.

And often - more often than not - the reason people get into trouble like this is not because they were borrowing money to buy bread for their children, but to buy a motorcycle or a new car.  We get into financial trouble wanting things we really can't afford.  And when the chickens come home to roost, we end up spending what little money we have on interest.

And it could be a car, or a smart phone, or cable television.  Quite frankly, I don't get the two latter ones - the combined bills from a smart phone and cable would equal a car payment on a fairly nice car these days.   And at least a car takes you somewhere....

The girl at the sandwich shop didn't so much need a new Hamster as she wanted one.   A used Corolla or something less appealing could be had for a lot less.  Or, like her smarter friend, she could have simply carpooled with a friend who was foolish enough to buy a brand-new car on a sandwich shop salary.

I know this, because when I was her age, working service-sector jobs, I went out and bought a new car and spend more money on interest than the car itself.  And I spent even more money on car insurance than the car and interest combined.  And the odd thing was, at the time I had working car that was paid for whose insurance was pretty low.  It was a bonehead mistake on my part, at the time, to spend an inordinate amount of my limited income on a new car, when a used car would have made so much more sense.

The good news is, of course, that you can change direction in life.  It doesn't happen overnight and it isn't like flicking a switch.   I decided, at age 25, to stop wanting and start having.  And that meant taking my finances more seriously and taking my education and career more seriously.  Oh, and yea, not spending every day and night trying to get as high as possible.  Yea, that.  No one wants to talk about it when it comes to finances, but when you hear these sob stories from young folks about how rotten they have it, well, odds are there are drugs involved.

And about seven years later, I had not only finished college, but law school, had a good job making decent money, and had a positive net worth.   It didn't happen overnight.  It didn't take 30 years, either.

And if you do this, well, you can end up owning money and get all those good deals the bank offers people who have money as opposed to those who have not.

Of course, there are still other traps along the way.   Once you start making more money, well, you might think, "Gee, I can afford more car now.  I should look at a new $75,000 E-class Mercedes wagon!" which is what many folks do - such as friends of mine from law school.   They end up broke and on the Hamster-wheel of life, just at a new level of paycheck-to-paycheck.  And the reason they do so is the same reason the girl at the sub-shop signed herself into hock:  Status.

Myself, I am at a point in my life where I can buy a "cheap" car and pay cash for it.  Or I could stress my finances by buying another BMW or Mercedes and end up with a car that costs 3-4 times as much, but doesn't deliver 3-4 times as much car.   I think I'll take the cheap car, thank you.

And if you want to buy a lightly used 1999 M Roadster, check out eBay this fall!