Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Excuses People Make....

This is a no whining zone.  If you want to get out of debt and become wealthy, yes, it takes hard work and self-sacrifice.  Too many Americans " want it all"  and then wonder why they are in such financial difficulty - and then want to blame others (minorities, immigrants, politicians, bankers) for their woes.  Take that shit elsewhere, please!  Chances are, your financial problems are entirely of your own doing.  Fixing them requires that you seriously examine your own actions, motives, and take full responsibility for your actions.  Oh, wait, what am I saying?  This is America!  Everyone is a victim, right?



In response to a recent blog posting about Net Worth, I received this comment which reflects the attitude of some people about savings:


"The average wage slave socking away $100 a week and retiring a millionaire seems a lot less likely now, without even factoring in the risk of being on the losing end of downturns."

Unfortunately, this sounds a lot to me like the whining loser-mentality that pervades our society these days.   People think that since they can't be a millionaire after saving for, say, two to three weeks, they might as well go out and blow it all on a Jet-Ski.  And people use the "current economic crises" as an excuse to engage in lazy thinking - that the end of the world is nigh.

But that is just loser talk - people who want to self-justify their poor financial choices by looking for poor normative cues that what they are doing is "OK" - and of course, the television is full of reassurance that a mountain of debt and a pile of depreciating metal in your yard is the American Dream.

In a way, it is like those folks who patrol nutrition and weight loss boards and decry anyone who even suggests good eating habits as "Nutrition Nazis" who are trying to "tell everyone what they should eat!"

And I have seen similar people patrolling monetary blogs and boards similarly trying to shout down the voices of financial reason - that somehow saving money is for chumps and that anyone who isn't over-consuming to the Nth degree is unAmerican.

Sorry, Charley, no sale.  I can't validate your poor lifestyle choices.

To begin with, if a young person at age 20 put aside $100 a week (a paltry $5200 a year), at 5% interest, after 45 years (age 65) they would have $871,962.85 in the bank.  Assuming they bought even a modest home and paid off their mortgage over that period of time, they clearly would be millionaires.  Well over millionaires, in fact.  It is not only not "less likely" it is quite likely.

For example, suppose they bought a modest $150,000 home today.  Even at only 2% annual appreciation (which is far below the long-term national average) after 45 years, their home will more than double in value, to $365,678.13.  Add in the $871,962.85in savings, and they have $1,237,640.98 in net worth.

Now, suppose they sell their home, move to Florida and buy a Park Model for $50,000, that leaves them well over a million dollars in the bank to retire on - in addition to Social Security.

Anyone making a middle-class income in this country can be a millionaire - if they chose to do so.  Few chose to do so.

"Oh," but you say, "What about the economic downturn?  Everything has changed!  Housing prices are down!  The stock market is down!  All is lost!  There is no point in saving!"

Nice try again, but no sale to bad goods.  Stock markets go up - and go down - and go back up.  You should understand this before investing.  And home prices go up and down, and if you can't spot a bubble for what it is, too bad for you.  Sorry that is harsh, but there you have it.

Just because some people made foolish financial choices does not mean that the economy is permanently damaged or the world is coming to an end.  And again, that is harsh, but the rest of us can't decide to abandon Democracy and our Country just because some jack-ass over-mortgaged himself to get granite counter-tops and now blames Obama.  We are not going to let our country go down because of a few weak-thinking individuals.

Housing prices will remain flat for the next 5-10 years, this is true - and I have commented on this before.  There may be some significant bargains out there right now or in the next 3-4 years, for the astute investor (this is how I made a lot of dough during the last "crises" in the 1990's).  But over time, prices will edge up again, following the 2-3% normal rate of appreciation that historically home prices have enjoyed.

And stock prices - well, they have already recovered from the "debacle" of 2009 and are edging slightly higher.  Given the astounding rates of return over the decade prior to 2009, the overall rate of return - even taking into account the various recessions and setbacks of the last 30 years  - is well above 5%.

Now of course, some might say, "Well, that is all very well and fine for the long-term investor, but I am near retirement age and lost it all when my stocks tanked and I panicked and sold them all and bought bonds and of course my over-mortgaged house is upside-down!"

Well, again, as I have noted time and time again in this blog, as you approach retirement age, you need to put more and more investments into safe harbors, such as bonds, CDs, and other investments that, barring a collapse of the government, will still be there for you when you retire (if the government collapses, forget investments, even Gold, you'll need bullets, so just forget that scenario).  A 60-year-old should not be in the stock market.

And similarly, a 60-year-old should not have a mortgage, either.  A 40-year working life is more than sufficient to pay off a 30-year mortgage.  By the time you retire, your home should be paid for for a number of reasons.  First, you don't want to have that monthly payment to make on a reduced income.  Second, if your home is paid off, you don't have to worry about these "upside down" scenarios.  Third, many people, if not most, these days, get laid off in their 50's, long before the coveted age 65 retirement.  Having an onerous mortgage payment when you are 55 an unemployed is never a good thing.

Now it is tempting to listen to the nay-sayers and the doom-and-gloom predictors and feel sorry for yourself.  There is some sick part of human nature that tends to want to pander to this emotion - but it is Emotional Thinking at its worst!

And yes, such thinking is often the hallmark of depression.  Rejecting such types of thinking is one way to get out of depression.  Depressed people think depressing thoughts, which in turn, makes them depressed.  You cannot succeed financially if your world-view is pessimistic.  Just as you cannot get your financial house in order if your brain is out-of-order.

Planning on the end of the world is like planning on winning the lottery (and news programs are full of helpful information on what to do if the latter should happen to you!).  But the reality is, your life will likely be unremarkable and you will eventually end up older and retiring.  And if you use End Times theology or the Lottery as your 401(k), well, life will surely suck in short order.

And I know all this because during my whole life there have been times when people have said the same thing, whether it was during the riots of 1968, the gas crises of 1973, 1977 or 1981, or the economic downturn of 1979 or the "Black Friday" of 1987, the housing busts of 1989 and 2009, and now the "economic meltdown" of 2009.

And in every case, society soldiers on, markets recover, and things continue, largely as before.  Using the current economic situation as an excuse for poor financial planning is not a very wise thing to do.

On the other hand, if one is clever, the current economic situation can be a good investment opportunity - and a good learning opportunity as well.

You do have choices.  You can save money, pay down debt, and become wealthier.  And you can become a millionaire.  But even if you don't, having more money is far better than having less.  And being broke sucks most of all.   And for our generation, who has to retire on their savings we don't have much of a choice, do we?  Defined pension plans are largely dead, unless you work for the gub-ment.

5 comments:

bm3719 said...

I didn't mean to give the impression that I think came across with that comment. I generally agree with the content of your financial posts, but was attempting to point out an aspect of the reasoning behind some of the consumers I know.

I work around engineers, most of whom make well over six figures. Yet, the vast majority of these guys have negative net worth. When I ask them why they don't save, they give reasons like the ones I mentioned (along with others like tax write-offs for debt).

Personally, I'm on track to retire in 5 years (I'm 32 now) and currently save 100% of my post-tax income. I've also long since covered my living expenses with investment income (in my case, I mostly manage it myself, minus the 401k). I've been following yours and a few other blogs of early retirees to get ideas of any of the aspects of it that I've missed, and you have given me a few ideas, so thanks for that.

Robert Platt Bell said...

I did not think that was YOUR attitude with regard to savings, but that the comment reflected that of a LOT of folks I know.

People actually rationalize poor financial habits by saying things like that!

I know full well what you are talking about, as I nearly fell into that trap myself. And I see it happening far too often in this country - people making six-figure incomes who are essentially broke.

Most don't realize it until they lose that "dream job" and all the shiny toys and mortgaged home are lost.

Or, as in the case of one Attorney I know who died, his widow discovering that their lavish mansion home, Mercedes and BMWs, country club membership, etc, was all propped up by a mountain of debt, no savings and no life insurance. She went from living the life of a millionaire to homeless in less than year.

There is no reason someone making a hundred grand a year should be poor, but there you have it.

I could easily have retired a decade ago if I had done what you are doing now. Instead, I squandered an enormous amount of money on "things" that I thought I had to have.

I was fortunate that I did not squander more and that I made a lot of money. But still, the lost potential is enormous.

But I've seen people I know do things like cash in 401(k) plans to pay off credit card debt (which is sad that they have so much credit card debt and so little in their 401(k)).

Or worse, cashing in a 401(k) to "hang on" to an over-mortgaged home - destroying the only asset they have that can survive bankruptcy in order to try to save the first thing lost in bankruptcy.

I could go on, but the list is endless. People who spend $100 a month on cable, but have nothing in savings. Educated Attorneys taken in by "tax protester" seminars.

It is, quite frankly, amazing to me that someone can be smart enough to make a hundred grand a year and yet still be able to squander it all. And I've seen this over and over again.

Having NO DEBT and MONEY IN THE BANK really is a better way to go - and anyone can do it if they chose to. But most of use choose not to.

Kudos to you for figuring it out in time!

Robert Platt Bell said...

Note:

You can set up a self-directed IRA and use that money to invest directly - even in Real Estate - once you roll over your 401(k).

You can also set up a self-directed trading account by rolling over a 401(k) to an IRA, for example, with eTrade, etc.

phubaba said...

I actually like the fact that there isn't a quick fix for life. That you actually have to make decisions and use your brain. Taking responsibility for your life is the whole point of growing up. Life seems good when you are young.. parents taking care of you and all but there is nothing better than being in control of your own life. I think you wrote a post about this very fact a while back.

Robert Platt Bell said...

Most of the arguments I put in my blog are indeed arguments I have with myself. That is to say, with the me of 20 or 30 years ago.

Back then, I spent money as fast as I made it - faster even, by borrowing - and then wondered why I was not "getting ahead" in life.

I finally figured out that if I wanted to be independent and get ahead, I could not keep signing on to more and more debt and spending more and more of my income.

And it took 20 years to turn things around. It is a shame I did not figure things out before then!

Unfortunately, most people still operate as I did, 20-30 years ago, but well into their 50's and even 60's. Spending and not saving, and then blaming others for their woes.

It is lazy thinking, and lazy thinking is popular. Always has been, too.