Bissell Rocks!

I loved this little handheld vacuum to death!  Literally!

Years ago, we bought a Bissell model 1984 vacuum cleaner and fell in love with it.  It was lightweight, easy to use, easy to clean, held a charge forever, and went under even the smallest furniture.   It's only Achilles heel was the power switch, but I was able to replace that myself.  Over the years it has gotten worn by doing dumb things like vacuuming the sidewalk and such.  But it continues to bring joy, so I bought a second one at Janitorial Equipment Supply for $208 (regularly $299!).

We bought a model 1985 handheld (shown above) which was sold as a "car vac."  Some reviewers complained about the suction power, but I liked it. It even had a power head!  But once again, the power switch went bad and when I went online to get parts, I saw that it was recalled for potential battery fires - a problem we never had. I filled out the recall form, sent in a photo of the data plate and a couple of weeks later they send me a brand-spanking new Model 31783 Icon Pet Turbo stick vacuum, a $200 value, free!  Thanks, Bissell!

I now own five seven Bissell vacuum cleaners now. In addition to the two model 1984's and the late, great model 1985, we have an old corded bag model 1398 that we bought many years ago at Walmart (for under $50) which we left at the condo.  The tenant may have taken it.  By the way, the condo is on the market now.  Make an offer!

We also have a bagless cyclone unit (similar to the 1009) that a friend gave to us when they sold their 5th wheel trailer. We use it at the storage locker where we keep the camper. Eventually, it may go out to Mark's Studio when the old GE canister vac finally throws in the towel (clay dust is hard on vacuum cleaners). (We also have a RIGID portable shop vac, so with the two aging GE's that makes ten vacuum cleaners overall, I guess).

A neighbor was throwing away a model 2482, which is sort of like a dustbuster mounted on a stick. I snagged it because (a) it was a Bissell and (b) it said "lithium ion" on the front, so odds are, the battery was good, and (c) it could be perfect for the camper, as it was small and folded up for storage. I ordered the accessory crevice and upholstery tool from the Bissell site (their prices are about the same as eBay or Amazon) and downloaded the user manual. I took it apart and realized why they threw it away. The filter had never been cleaned and there was a wad of paper in the intake tube, which then clogged up with animal hair. A half-hour of cleaning and reassembly and we were back in business. The previous owners were nice enough to give me the charger plug!

Of course, the 1985 is now ready for the trash and the GE canister vacs will follow it when we run out of bags - they are beaten to death!  As for our older model 1984, if it breaks, I will keep the battery and the dirt canister as spares.  But until then, we can both vacuum at the same time!

As for this "free" vacuum, I believe the power head detaches like a dust-buster, so it may become our new handheld, or make its way to the camper.

 Vacuum cleaners have a hard life. Overall, I am happy with Bissell products - they certainly stand behind them! They work well and are inexpensive to buy.  And they are lightweight, easy to use, and best of all, cordless.

UPDATE: The new vacuum arrived and it is really a thing of beauty - literally.  Battery life so far seems weaker, but it has great suction, a "turbo" mode (which drains the battery faster) and handheld and floor attachments.   Thanks, Bissell!

It's No One's Fault, It's Everybody's Fault!

Bernie Sanders knows what its like to be a working man!

Bernie struggled through life.  He spent over a decade working his way through college, working for GM and UTC and even UPS as a Teamster.  He had several side hustles, including delivering pizzas, tutoring calculus and working as a paid intern at planned parenthood.  Once  he graduated, he started his own business and became a jobs creator, too!

Oh, wait, that's me.  Bernie worked as a handyman carpenter and failed at even that.  He decided to go into politics and became a career politician.  His wife ran a college into the ground.  He became a landlord and owns at least three or four houses, including a dacha on Lake Champlain.  Yes, he is a man of the people and knows of our struggle!

Or maybe not.  He plays the populist card, but like my stinking hippie brother's communist puppet shows,  he has no idea what working in a factory or warehouse is really like, other than in Marxist theory.  And as I noted before, you come down to the factory spouting that commie bullshit, the "workers" will beat the snot out of you.  The workers are very conservative, it turns out.

I have no doubt he is sincere in his beliefs - as was Ralph Nader - just wrong.  The reason the "workers" didn't embrace Harris was because not because they thought the the Democratic Party was not left enough but was too far left.  Bernie is right that the Democrats' platform didn't resonate with workers in steel mills in Springfield, Ohio.  But the reason they didn't resonate was Bernie and AOC and Ohmar.  They became the face of the Democratic party, thanks to Fox News and other right-wing media outlets, and Democrats let that go unchallenged.

There is a reason why, too.  If Democrats distanced themselves from the far-Left of the party, they risk alienating the far-Left voters, who are skittish as it is - often threatening not to vote unless their demands are not met.  This is what I call, "hostage politics" and it is quite popular these days.

Meanwhile, moving toward the center to appease moderate "independent" voters didn't work either, as the GOP and its media (and Russian) cohorts painted the Democrats as radicals.  For many middle-of-the-road Americans, the idea of voting for a Democrat was just a non-starter, even if that candidate was Reagan or Trump (who were both Democrats at one time, oddly enough).

The Democratic "brand" has been tarnished and to many Americans, it stands for transgender school operations, litter boxes in the classroom for furries, student loan forgiveness, welfare state, and increased taxes.  Most of these characterizations (if not all of them) are false, but they stuck.  And they stuck because people love rage-bait - they love to hate things.  And Fox News gave them a colorful piñata to whack at.  And it felt good.

So no, it wasn't Bernie's fault - entirely - or that of Reps AOC and Omar.  They represent a portion of the party that is on the leftish side, and the GOP used them to decorate their piñata.  On the other hand, Sanders has some balls claiming to represent the working man, when he has never worked a day in his life as a factory worker or hard hat or fast-food worker.  He has a lot of nice theories about what these jobs are like, but no real hard experience.

America is a conservative country. So are most other countries in the world.  All across the world, right-wing parties are making gains or are in control.  Even "liberal" Western Europe is turning to right-wing politics, in part due to the worldwide immigration crises.   Leftist politics are past their "sell-by" date, worldwide.

Democrats are able to achieve power only when they lean in toward the center and advance centrist causes.  Leftists hate this, but it is part and parcel of "the art of the possible."  If you look back at the Democratic Presidents of the post-war era, you see a lot of centrist and sometimes conservative policies.

Kennedy cut taxes, expanded our role in Vietnam, and even greenlighted a ill-fated invasion of Cuba.  Johnson did expand civil rights and "the great society" but escalated the war even further.  Jimmy Carter was from the conservative South and implemented the deregulation of industries that Reagan largely took credit for (a typical Republican trick, by the way).  And Clinton?  He negotiated the legislation that resulted in welfare being disbanded, replaced by TANF, which provides only five years of "assistance" for your lifetime.

Even poor Obama was called out by the far-Left as being too conservative. Seems you just can't win at this game, no matter what you do!

People complain about our "two-party" system, yet when I went to the polls, there were five names on the Presidential ticket.  The reason why three of them never went anywhere was because no one is that far-left or far-right.  Heck, half the people voting for fringe candidates like Russian asset Jill Stein, do so only as a "protest vote."

So no, the problem wasn't that the Democrats were "not far left enough" but that they were painted as too far left.   But yes, too, Bernie is right in that the Democrats didn't explain well enough how their platform would help the working class.

Tell people you will lower taxes on the middle class and raise taxes on the rich and all they hear is "...raise taxes..." because, let's face it, everyone thinks they are the "rich" particularly when you classify "rich" as someone making over $400,000 a year.  You'd be surprised how many middle-class people make that much, particularly when they have dual incomes at good jobs.

The flip side is also true - they hear about cutting taxes for the lower classes and they think, "tax cut for minorities" which of course is racist.  Act shocked.  Trump's pie-in-the-sky proposals to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime resonated with the working class as he was talking directly about cutting taxes on labor itself.  A waitress who has to cough up extra  money to cover taxes on her tips (which often wipes out the base pay) feels they are being over-taxed.  A factory worker agrees to work overtime, only to see the tax on his overtime pay rocket up (because of the higher pay rate) and appear to negate the time-and-a-half or double-time pay rate.

So yea, maybe Bernie has a point, but his solution isn't the answer.  Going further left isn't going to entice conservative workers.

Of course, people are "blaming"  other groups - young white men who follow Andrew Tate, Hispanics who are conservative Catholics, white women who vote their own rights away, Jews who think that Harris was too soft on Hamas, Palestinians who though Harris was too hard on Israel - the list goes on and on.  You can't please everybody, particularly when they have been so effectively divided up into factions.

So, how did Trump do it?  After all, while the Leftists are threatening me with universal healthcare and free college, there are, on the far-right, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, racists, misogynists, and antisemites, some of who have promised violence (or actually engaged in it) to get their way.   How Trump navigates this is interesting.  He "dog whistles" to the extremists ("good people on both sides") which infuriates the Left, but who cares?  Half of the Left is threatening not to vote anyway, as a protest.

Republicans fall in line.  They also have selective hearing.  They might be peripherally aware that odious elements of the far-right support Trump, but they seem to be comfortable with filtering that out.  Meanwhile, if even one Antifa activist expresses support for Harris, well, she's dead to them (Republicans, that is).  Like I said, selective hearing.

There are some on the far-left who want to see the system fail.  I talked with a friend who was upset over the election outcome.  He said, "I hope these fuckers who voted for Trump lose their homes, their jobs, and their life savings - even if it means the same for me!  Maybe only then will they see the folly of their ways and vote progressive!"  It is the age-old argument of tearing down before starting over.   Destroying the village to save the village.  Sucks to be a Villager!

On that note, we made our reservations for a 14-day transitioning (repositioning) cruise to Spain.   Cruise lines move their boats from the Caribbean to the Mediterranean and back, based upon demand.  The fares are very low (~$750 per person) and the ships are sparsely populated.  We plan on renting a VW camper van and exploring the Iberian peninsula, including Portugal, to see the sights and also think about expat living.  We are taking another cruise ship back, to New Orleans, a month-and-a-half later, staying there a while and then taking the train home (sleeper car).  It should be a fun trip.  This summer, we are going to Canada to cool off and see what our options are there as well.

And no TSA, no Karens trying to claim your seat, no $20 drinks at the airport lounge!  Crossing the Atlantic by ship - twice!

And before you say it, yes, I saw the article in the paper today about the "Four year cruise" - it is a scam.  The company has a tired old cruise ship and has a chequered history, even before making that offer.  And the price is ridiculous!  For less than half the $250,00 they are asking, you could spend four years on state-of-the-art cruise ships!

Russia Foiled Again?

While the election turned out in Russia's favor, maybe it wasn't what they really wanted.

I was listening to an NPR show on the radio recently.  Now that Trump has won, NPR, WaPo, and NYT suddenly rediscover their role as "liberal media."  I guess even they too, will sell their country up the river for a nickle with that "both sides" and "sanewashing" approach before the election.  Now that everyone on the Left is paranoid, well, they've gone back to being a beacon for liberals.  All I can say is, don't trust 'em!

The show was interesting as one brief piece was about a Russian podcaster who was far-right - sort of their version of Alex Jones.  And he was upset that Trump won.  The Russian playbook was to repeat the events of January 6th, by having Harris win by a narrow margin.  Then, the Russian Internet Research Agency could spread "election fraud"  rumors and start another insurrection or perhaps this time, civil war.

Their goal, he said, was chaos.   If Americans started a civil war it would shrink our power on the world stage and help the narrative of actual and wanna-be dictators who have used January 6th as an example of why Democracy doesn't work.  A peaceful transition of power?  That's no fun for Russia!

So of all the possible outcomes, Trump winning wasn't on their Bingo card and Russia is kind of pissed-off about that, at least according to this Aleks Dzhons of Russia.

I thought that was fascinating. A friend of mine went to Afghanistan and came back with a long beard and some long stories. I asked him why the Taliban was blowing up civilians in terror attacks on their own countrymen. "Chaos works in their favor," he replied. And that is the goal of the terrorist - terror. There is no pork chop hill to take over or strategic military goals to achieve. Just chaos.

So a smooth election foiled their carefully laid plans.

What will happen now remains to be seen. Much of the "Project 2025" agenda will require legislation from Congress - some parts even require Constitutional Amendment. Not all Republicans are on board with this agenda, and if only a few defect, or the filibuster remains in effect, well, the flywheel of Congress could put a check on Trump's ambitious plans. And all it will take is a 24-month delay until the mid-terms. At that point, we may see the majority in the House or Senate change, as it often does during mid-terms.

Of course, this assumes the Democrats get their shit together and put forth candidates that can get elected. Here in Georgia, Republicans often run unopposed. How hard is it to put someone - anyone - on the ballot? You need not even campaign - just wait for your opponent to get caught up in some predictable scandal.

Anyway, gotta go - booking our transatlantic cruise to Spain and Portugal. Scouting out some ex-pat locations to hide for four years!

Congratulations President Hoover! (What Went Wrong - Or Did It?)

Fat guy with weird hair who thinks tariffs will save the economy.  Hmmm.....

I noted in my last posting that Hillary was leading in the polls prior to election day 2016.  She lost.  But in her defense, she won the popular vote.   This time around, it appears that not only did Trump win the electoral college, but the popular vote as well.  This leaves a lot of people scratching their heads looking for an explanation.  I think it is not one thing, but a host of small things that the GOP took advantage of, to win.

1. The Candidate(s):  Joe Biden ran as a one-term President.  Then he changed his mind.  Then he changed his mind again, and Kamala was anointed his successor, only weeks before the convention.  Whatever your political views are, this is a unique series of events in US History - as unique as a President being voted out of office - and voted back in again.  And no, Donald Trump is no Grover Clevelend - he's much fatter!

Kamala was not my first choice, but rather a "Not Trump!" candidate.  Some argue that was all she was and didn't have a platform of her own.  This was not true, but as we shall see, the Democrats made the fundamental mistake of letting the opposing party define you.  Once you go along with that, you are toast.

2.  Democrats Fall In Love, Republicans Fall In Line:  It is an old saying and it is true - Republicans have a "what's in it for me?" attitude, whether their issue is abortion, the economy, lower taxes, jobs, immigration or whatever.  So long as the candidate gives them something they want, the overlook other issues which they believe don't affect them.  So they will go along with the party line and vote obediently.

Democrats, on the other hand, seem to want a candidate who reflects all of their values without exception.  And we saw this on the far-left, which, encouraged by Russian Internet trolls, claimed they would not vote for Biden (and later Harris) unless the Democrats gave in to a laundry list of far-left demands.  The fact that Trump will give them nothing, didn't seem to faze them.

In fact, some were cheering on a Trump victory.  As in 2016, many of the "Bernie Bros" voted for Trump, hoping the country would fall into collapse and thrust Bernie into the oval office. Yes, people actually think this way and there is historical precedent for it.  Communists in Germany, for example, hoped that they would win in the end as people turned away from fascism.  I guess that sort of happened, at least in East Germany.  But usually what happens is the other side wins and then puts you in jail.

3. Palestine: Harris had to walk a tightrope on Israel and Palestine.  If she came across as too sympathetic to the plight of civilians in Palestine, she risked offending some Jewish voters in swing States.  On the other hand, if she came across as too pro-Israel, she risked offending Arab voters.

In Dearborn, Michigan, a largely Muslim community today, Joe Biden won in 2020 with 80% of the vote, according to NPR this morning.  Harris lost to Trump 41% to 31%.  Jill Stein, who actually visited the city, scored an amazing 18% of the vote.  This time around, third parties didn't appear to be "spoilers" as in the past, but rather "none of the above" (as in Utah) or not voting was what turned the tide.

And the optics were horrible.  Some pro-Palestinian protesters were seen lauding Hamas and Hezbollah, as if they were legitimate political parties and not terrorist organization.  Again, people - and Republicans in particular - vote with their own self-interest in mind.  And to a majority of Americans, the math is simple:  Israel hasn't blown up a disco or pushed a man in a wheelchair off a cruise ship.  Hamas and the PLO and Hezbollah have killed Americans, while Israel hasn't.  Like it or not, this means Americans see Israel as "the good guys" and Palestinians as the bad.

As an added bonus, many fundamental Christians believe the end times are upon us (and Trump certainly fits the bill as the Antichrist!) and see the Middle East in this context of prophesies foretold.  They actually want world war three to break out in Israel as they believe it was set forth in Revelations.  Plus, I guess, they don't mind seeing a lot of Jews killed.  Yes, they are pro-Israel and yet, antisemitic.  Not the brightest bunch.

4. The Youth Vote That Wasn't:  A lot was bet on young people, some just coming of age, voting for Harris.  And many did.  Many did not and many more simply didn't vote.  The GOP has done a good job of dumbing down education and Trump sure loves his "poorly educated" voters.  But even those of good education and high intelligence, the voting record is poor.

Even during the Vietnam War, when the "what's in it for me?" crowd had a big dog in the fight, many young people saw voting as a scam or not worth doing.  In fact, the riots at the 1968 convention (because Humphrey wasn't anti-war enough) only insured a Nixon victory.  Again, since they can't get everything they want, they will insure that everyone gets the exact opposite.

Recent research suggests that the human brain doesn't fully develop - mature - until about age 25.  This is why we send 18-year-olds off to fight our wars and not 30-somethings who know better.  My own experience is this was the exact age I gave up drugs and alcohol, finished my Engineering degree, started my career and went to law school.  Prior to that, I was just a big, goofy kid (and am regressing back to that as we speak).

Young men in particular are very susceptible to peer pressure and influence.  Joe Rogan Bros are a case in point.  That is, if they vote at all - voting is so gay - right?

Among young leftists, the problem is worse.  They are too young to understand that idealism is fine and all, but sometimes - most times - you have to settle for what is possible.  "Politics is the art of the possible" according to Otto von Bismark.  Wrong guy but he had the right idea.  Compromise is one of those things you learn after age 25 when you realize that while the world is not an ideal place, it still is pretty decent, if you don't obsess about perfection.

Whatever the reason, the youth vote for Harris wasn't enough to turn the tide and relying on the youth vote is a bad idea for any campaign.

5. Race and Gender:  One issue you didn't see the Democrats raising this time was the fact we might have a "woman President."  I still have a refrigerator magnet that the Hillary campaign sent me that says "Madam President" - celebrating the novelty of it all.  This time around, only Republicans harped on race or gender, with Trump famously making his "she turned black" comments.

Republicans knew they could afford to piss off minorities as, well, they are minorities and white people still make up 70% of the country.  But even then, there are minorities who don't consider themselves minorities but will be in for a rude awakening pretty soon.  I noted before how my friends from Latin America were insulted if you suggested their ancestry was anything other than 100% Spanish.  Even the head of the "Proud Boys" white supremacy group is of afro-cuban ancestry.  He doesn't realize that people named "Enrique" are not allowed in the Country Club, except through the servants' entrance.

Some people call this the "pick me!' mentality.  People like this believe that when racist or misogynist slurs are being bandied about, they are not talking about them but rather those others who of course, are bad.  The far-right has another term for them, "the people we kill last!" (as was applied to Yanni Yapalapalopalous).

6. They Go Low, We Go High: This was Hillary's strategy and it backfired in a big way.  Study after study shows that negative ads work which is why politicians use them.  Willie Horton ads and Swiftboating were abhorrent, but they worked to elect Bush and his son.   No one even remembers the names of their opponents.

Online, we saw ads for Trump claiming Harris was a "border czar" who personally let in millions of "illegal immigrants."  Of course, no such "border czar" position exists.  Vice Presents attend State funerals overseas and act as a tie-breaking vote in the Senate.  Period.

The Kamala ads were upbeat and positive and fizzled out.  Tax cuts for the middle class!  Tax the rich!  It sounded much more vague than Trump's false promises to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime and "protect" Social Security.  Trump is the friend of the working man! /s

What I would have liked to see is Harris fighting back in an ad using the same ominous voice the GOP uses in their ads, pointing out that Biden got a bi-partisan bill ready for Congress and had the votes to pass it, but it was Trump who killed the deal.  And Trump is a liar and who wants to vote for a liar?

There was mountains of "negative" to use against Trump - often in his own words!  Democrats used none of it.  They wanted to be above the fray, I guess.

And I guess Harris, like Hillary, had no choice.  A man using attack ads to get elected is being decisive and bold.  A woman doing the same thing is a whiny harpy.  And it ain't just men saying that - a lot of women, secretly or otherwise, believe the same thing.

* * *

So, where does this leave us? Will project 2025 be enacted?  Will Trump slap tariffs on imports and start a trade war with China (raising prices through the roof and destroying our export economy)?  We'll see.

I wonder sometimes if the Democrats wanted to lose.  The last decade or two have been a repeat of the same two decades 100 years ago.  We had an epidemic back then, a war, and then a booming economy that seemed to grow for no organic reason.  Everyone was trading stocks, the rich got richer while the working classed got screwed.  In 1929, it all came crashing down at once.  And Herbert Hoover pushed through the Smoot-Hawley tariff act of 1930 which put the nail in the coffin of a dying economy.

Could the same thing happen again?  Maybe Democrats saw the writing on the wall and realized if they won, they would inherit a major recession.  Let Trump win, and he has to "own" it - and make it far worse with his half-assed economic proposals.  By 2028, maybe Americans will be finally fed up with "tax cuts for the rich" and "trickle-down economics" and vote Democratic.

Maybe.  But by then there may not be another election.  Besides, that smacks of the Bernie Bros methodology - tear down the system to change it.  That rarely works without a lot of suffering involved.

Meanwhile, Mr. See is bombarding me with brochures and books on how to live the ex-pat life in Panama or Portugal or Catalonia...  There is a transitioning cruise on Holland America to Portugal in April, and the Condo is up for sale.

Stay Tuned!

What Next? (It Ain't Over Yet!)

If you think the election is finally over, you're sadly mistaken.

Today is election day and we go to choose a new president as well as other elected officials. A lot of people are breathing a sigh of relief, as they were sick of all the political ads and political controversy. But it's hardly over by a long shot.

If Trump wins, I expect Kamala Harris will probably concede if the election, if it is clearly in Trump's favor. However, something tells me this won't be the case. Although polls have shown the race to be neck and neck, I think there's a lot of people, such as myself, who don't answer strange phone calls or respond to polls.  Polls showed Hillary winning in 2016, as you may recall.

The long lines at early voting stations and the vast number of mail-in ballots seem to indicate that voter turnout will be better than ever and this does not bode well for the Republicans. Republicans have always known that if they can get their base to vote and get the other party uninterested in voting, they have a better chance of winning. Voter turnout historically does not favor Republicans.

So, I think there's a good chance that Kamala Harris could win the election. But that doesn't mean that she would win the election. Already Trump is talking about voter fraud and will continue talking about it till he takes his last breath when he dies of old age.

The Trump campaign will file countless frivolous lawsuits alleging voter fraud but not providing any real evidence or data to support these allegations. Why do I know this? Because they did the same thing back in 2020 and their playbook is pretty limited.

Their goal is not to win these lawsuits but to delay, delay, delay. It's similar to the Bush v. Gore situation where each party filed lawsuits to change the outcome of the Florida election. The Bush team simply got judges to stay the recount of the votes until the clock ran out, at which point Bush took Florida and became President.

Each State selects electors based on popular vote. However, if there's a problem with the vote or even an alleged problem it could be bounced to the State House and an alternate slate of electors could be submitted. Trump tried to do this in 2020 and was rebuffed in every State. However, since then, Trump has managed to get some of his operatives onto election boards, and many of the swing States have a Republican majority in their State legislatures. Of course, this is due to gerrymandering which allows them to stay in power, even if they don't represent a majority of the population.

But it doesn't end there. Last time around on January 6th, they were counting the electoral votes in a joint session of Congress. If one member of House and one member of the Senate objects to a particular slate of electors, the Joint session of Congress adjourns to investigate the issue. They did this once after the January 6th insurrection, however even Republicans were ashamed of what was going on and put an end to it rather quickly.

This time around I'm not so sure. Speaker Johnson has promised to turn the election to Trump, regardless of the outcome of the vote. And if they decide to quash a particular slate of electors, they could turn the tide and Trump's favor. Again there's always the possibility of more lawsuits and the entire thing being bounced to a Trump-appointed Supreme court.

I know this sounds all doom and gloom, but you were around in January 6th, correct? You do remember the nauseating feeling between election day and inauguration day where all that shenanigans went down and kind of ruined everybody's Christmas.

There is, however, some hope. For example, here in Georgia - which went for Biden at 2020 - our governor flat out refused to "find 20,000 votes" for Donald Trump. This was basically attempted election fraud. You can't find votes you can only manufacture them. Trump was basically asking for our Governor to commit fraud and our Governor wisely declined.

Similarly, our Secretary of State also declined to get involved in Trump shenanigans and counted the votes legitimately even if they worked against his own party. I recently heard a press conference of his on Georgia Public Radio and it was interesting how he laid out how they have improved security and procedures to make sure that there are no problems with counting the votes this time around. Last time, so-called "Vote Auditors" showed up and banged on windows and tried to intimidate election workers. I suspect if they try that this time around they will be met with furious resistance from the government.

The good news is, more people early-voted in Georgia than voted in the last election. Turnout is good!

People like to make stereotype generalizations about the South, but they largely aren't true. There are a lot of good people in the South who don't go along with racism and misogyny and right-wing thinking. You have to remember Georgia was the state that elected Jimmy Carter as Governor. You might say Georgia swings both ways.

But I'm not sure about other States, and there might be some situations where elected officials try to turn the outcome of the election in Trump's favor. We'll just have to stay tuned. I'm sure it's going to get ugly.

What really worries me is all this talk about civil war. America is the most well-armed country in the world in terms of the civilian population. A lot of the people who own massive collections of firearms are mentally unhinged. In fact, unless you're an avid collector of vintage firearms and a real expert in these matters, having a vast arsenal of weapons and ammunition is kind of the definition of insanity. There's really no point in owning several dozen AR-15s and tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition unless you plan on causing trouble.

There have been scattered reports for years now of people making ominous comments about how they want to kill Democrats. For example a Amazon driver recently threw a package at a customer's porch in muttered something about Democrats deserve to die. This strikes me is very odd as he is working for the richest man in the world (or second richest man in the world) while struggling to make ends meet is an Amazon driver. Does he truly believe that cutting Jeff Bezos' taxes will trickle down to him? It's hard to believe.

But I do believe there will be some incidents, hopefully isolated incidents, where Trump supporters will go off and start shooting people randomly, targeting Democrats in particular or anyone they feel is not a true American. And I believe that between now and inauguration day and maybe afterwards they will be episodes of political violence.

Now you may say I'm being alarmist. You may say this is all speculation. But these are things that Republicans have promised America if they don't get their way. And sadly, a lot of people feel that to avoid trouble we should just cave into Republicans, much as people during the Weimar Republic caved into nazis. I mean how bad could it get?

Stay tuned and find out!