Our generation will not have the " defined pension benefits" of earlier generations. People even make noises that we should not expect to receive Social Security! Instead, we are told we will have to rely on our own savings in the form of a 401(k) or IRA. Why did we get the shaft?
One of the more popular hits on this blog is my posting on using your 401(k) to pay off your mortgage. A lot of people are curious about this, and the short answer is, it can't be done without paying a boatload of taxes. Sorry.
But it illustrates the ultimate conundrum about the raw deal our generation got from this self-funded retirement scam. In the olden days - like 1960, a worker at a steel mill got paid, and then used that money to pay down the mortgage on his house. When he retired, his house was paid for and the steel mill paid him a monthly pension, which was more than enough to live on. And he was paid for the rest of his life, until he died, or his wife died after him. People were taken care of, and it was a bit of Corporate Socialism to be sure.
Today, that worker is expected to self-fund his own 401(k) or IRA, so that when he retires, he will have enough money to survive on besides Social Security. Is this a bad thing? I am beginning to think so, and here's why.
1. Most People Don't Have Financial Discipline: Look around you - all your neighbors are idiots - spending money on Jet Skis and penis boats and cable TV, while failing to fund their 401(k) or IRA. Average savings at retirement for most Americans is less than $100,000. How are these people going to live? It is the next big financial crises in this country - the one no one talks about!
2. We Knew All Along This Would Happen: The IRS uses "withholding" to take money from your paycheck every week, because they KNOW that the average Joe has no financial discipline. If people had to "save up" for their annual tax bill, most would be owing the IRS a boatload of dough come April 15th. So we created "withholding" - we knew people couldn't save for a year! Now, we expect them to save for 30 years? What were we thinking?
3. Nothing is Guaranteed: Unlike the defined pension benefits of the past, no one is guaranteed with an IRA or 401(k) any kind of income for life. You might be able to purchase an annuity when you retire. Question is, how much do you need to retire and what is a safe investment? Our generation will not have the relaxing assured retirement of the past.
4. You Can Lose It All: As I noted in my Lump Sum Payouts post, most people are ill-equipped to handle large sums of money. One criticism of the privatization of Social Security was that individuals would make poor choices with the money and lose it all. Similarly, when the opportunity to invest your own money comes along, most of us do a poor job of it. And when we reach age 59-1/2, and can withdraw from your IRA or 401(k), many will sqander it in short order. If you invested poorly, you might not have much money when you retire and end up broke.
5. Going Broke to Save: Many middle-class Americans are desperately trying to save money in their 401(k) plans, while at the same time trying to pay off a mortgage, car loans, and credit cards. When the market went horribly wrong last year, many folks were chagrined to find out they had enough money in their 401(k) to pay off their mortgage, but yet were "broke". Cashing in the 401(k) simply wasn't a realistic option, unless they wanted to incur a huge tax penalty and be boosted into the highest bracket.
6. Paying the Banks on Both Ends: As I have noted time and time again, using the tax code as an investment guide is a bad idea. And yet, just as States are coerced into passing laws in order to get highway funds (such as seatbelt laws) we personally have to "jump through hoops" to avoid paying onerous tax bills. So the tax code says "borrow against your home - it's deductible!" and we do. And the tax code says "put your savings in a 401(k) or IRA - it's tax-deferred!" and we do. And bankers are there at both ends of the deal, collecting fees on our mortgages and for managing our Mutual funds. Meanwhile, we are pretty much broke most of the time, and if the market tanks and the value of our home goes down (as it recently did for a lot of people) you end up with NOTHING. But the banks made out, didn't they?
7. Loaning Money to Yourself: It is highly likely that at least some of your 401(k) money was invested in mutual funds, which in turn invested in mortgage-backed securities, which in turn was loaned back to you in the form of your mortgage. You were, in effect loaning money to yourself. Why not cut out the middleman and just pay down your mortgage? Oh, right, there is no "tax incentive" to do that!
8. A Pig in a Poke in a Pig in a Poke: Most of us - nearly all of us - are not sophisticated investors. We buy Mutual Funds with our 401(k) money. What do they invest in? Beats me! Most of us pick a fund based on the brand name and past performance. But past performance, as they say, is no guarantee of future returns, as we found out. A Mutual Fund ends up being a Pig in a Poke - you have no idea what you stocks you are investing in. And even if you did, stocks are largely a Pig in a Poke as well - hardly the "transparent" transaction the free-market people like to talk about. Ever read an annual report and understood it? I didn't think so. And as the antics of Enron illustrate, even if you did understand these reports, you'd likely be snookered anyway.
9. No Social Security? Pundits and Government Officials have been saying things for years, now, along the lines of "don't expect to collect any Social Security!" which is a nice way of saying "Screw you, we got it, you don't!" But the reality is, as the baby boomers retire, the system will be strained. And since so many didn't save a plug nickle, many will be living off of Social Security. I fully expect to get a total screw-job in this department, as the Government rewards slackers (yet once again) by saying "Sorry Bob, you had the foresight to SAVE for retirement, so you don't 'need' Social Security! We're giving your share to some crackhead bum instead!" Just wait for it - that is how it will play out.
* * * *
This is not to say you should not fund your 401(k) or IRA. You have to. It is the only game in town - the tax code forces us to do this. And this is an example of the government "forcing us" or more correctly coercing us to do things that the teabaggers and flat-taxers are complaining about. Perhaps a more value-neutral tax system would prevent some of the excesses of a de facto command economy that tax incentives produce.
I have invested a substantial sum over the years in my tax-deferred accounts. Most are in Mutual Funds, and frankly, other than the brand name of the fund, I could tell you little about what they are actually invested in. They could have stuffed it all in a mattress, for all I know. While it was all going up, up, up, it was great. When it dropped by nearly 1/3, I shit my pants. Most funds recovered, but it was a wake-up call that perhaps I should not rely too much on stocks as my sole investment as I lurch toward retirement.
I am going to go against the tax code and pay off my mortgage. While this may seem non-intuitive, I'd rather be able to say I owned one tangible thing, than to put that money into yet more stocks and have a monthly mortgage payment to make. It may be somewhat risk-averse, but as we get older, we can't afford to take wild risks with our money anymore.
But on a larger level, I wonder sometimes how we got to where we are today, where everyone has to fend for themselves, no one has an assured retirement, we all are forced to march to the drum of the tax code, and as a result, all our money is handed over to bankers who say "trust me" and then steal it all.
Perhaps I am being a bit dramatic. But ask the guy who lost over half of his 401(k) last year - the year he retired involuntarily when they closed the widget factory - and his house dropped nearly half in value. The poor bugger was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and now he is in foreclosure, bankruptcy, and is looking forward to a meager, stressful, and impoverished retirement.
And the best most of us can do, is shake our heads and say, "I'm glad that's not ME!"
How did we get here?


9 comments:
If I had it to do over again.... I wouldn't get involved in any 401k. But I WOULD save my money! Just not in one of these.
By the time you lose a lot of your money... gain it back... lose it again, you probably would have earned just as much with a simple passbook savings. Why impose a big set of unnecessary rules on yourself? Why involve all the kings horses and all the kings men? Just... save you money!!!
Thanks for your comment.
I think when you contribute to a 401(k) you have to ask yourself the following questions:
1. Does the employer match contributions? In the old days, this was prevalent, but less so today. But if they do, make sure you contribute enough to get ALL the matching funds. 100% return on your investment, immediately, is too good to pass up!
2. How much can you contribute without being financially stressed? You should have AFTER-TAX savings as well as 401(k) savings - and you should have a plan to pay off debt. Maxing out your 401(k) contribution while running up credit card debt or taking out home equity loans makes no sense at all - and yea, we all did it back in the 2000's!
3. How much tax savings are you getting? If you are making $200,000 a year, you might be getting back 28-33% on your taxes. If you are making $68,000 a year, maybe only 15%. The tax advantage of the 401(k) does favor the rich, to be sure!
I think overall a hybrid approach is best - pay down debts, put money into after-tax savings, and put money into the 401(K). Make sure you are not paying a lot of fees in the plan, too. Some funds, like American Funds, charge a 5% fee, which is pretty hefty!
But you are right, you have to SAVE MONEY in any event. The 401(k) is just one vehicle for doing so. IRAs, Roth IRAs (for younger people) are also good ideas, as is after-tax savings.
And I can tell you, having no debt whatsoever is also a nice thing to work toward as well!
Sometimes I wonder if the whole 401k thing is rigged!
I hope that doesn't sound too paranoid, but I do wonder if a "group" savings would get any kind of preferential treatment over an individual account, or if I'm just an idiot who doesn't know how to manage my money.
I bought a ROTH IRA from Fidelity in 2000, when I was "in between" pension plans. Now, Fidelity is a well respected group, so I think at least I tried to chose a reputable group. But for ten years, do you know that ROTH never made one blessed nickel, it only lost money.
And I tried to chose mutual funds that were well rated. I thought I gave them enough time to perform properly. All I ever did was lose money! It was crazy.
I finally cashed it in this year. No penalties against me because I had no capital gains whatsoever!
I lost eight hundred dollars.
See, if I'd put it in passbook savings, I'd still have the principal, and maybe a little more.
Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
I think when investing in mutual funds, it all depends which fund. With Fidelity, we have had good luck with Equity Income, which has nearly doubled in value since we opened the account back in the 1990's. It all depends on the fund you are in. What fund or funds were you in?
Of course, for the last three years, it has largely remained flat - well, it nosedived to nearly 1/2 its value and has now recovered.
Diversification is the key - have multiple accounts in different funds and different kinds of investments.
And expect some of them to go south - lose money, or even go bust (like my GM, Fannie Mae, and Fleetwood stocks). So long as you are diversified, you can afford the loss.
But be careful about "cashing out" on a fund because it is losing money. I knew some folks who "cashed out" in January 2009, convinced that the market would go even lower - and ended up "locking in their losses".
For example, if I had sold my Fidelity Equity Income back then, it would have been worth about 2/3 what it is today. But by hanging on, I rode it back up to the top.
FEAR is what drives people to sell when stocks crash, and GREED is what causes them to "hang on" when the go ballistic.
Make sure you are not falling into that trap, because if you do, you will end up doing the "buy high, sell low" trick and lose it all.
But then again, that is the whole point of this posting - as average working-class schmucks, we don't understand markets that well, but are forced to become investors in order to save for retirement! So they throw us in the deep end of the pool with the sharks and say "keep swimming!"
So far, diversification seems to be the only thing that I think works. I have tried to pay off debts (including mortgage), invest in savings accounts, bonds, etc., have some life insurance (whole life), some stocks (self-directed IRA, which hasn't done too badly, but maybe I'm just lucky, not smart), and of course, the old stand by, mutual funds (fidelity, american funds, vanguard).
Surely one of these has to work out in the long run! I'm hoping, anyway....
My friends on the island, who have defined benefit pensions from government jobs are the most relaxed people in the world. They don't seem to give a whit about the stock market or whatever. And if inflation goes up, so does their pension!
THAT was the way to live! But those days are gone - for most of us...
Well, they're saying now that CSRS pensions are underfunded by ten billion, and FERS is underfunded by... a mere billion, so your friends may be living in a dream world!
They're also trying to push legislation that will totally eliminate federal pensions by the year 2013, so all federal employees will have is just their TSP.
Crazy, in my opinion! (can you tell I'm a federal employee? LOL )
Instead of making life suck for us, why don't they work on making jobs and job benefits better for the private sector?
It has been a long time since I worked for Uncle Sugar, but as I recall, we were eligible only for TSP. We got some small pension from FERS, or something (they paid me few hundred cash for that when I left). But "new" employees were supposed to use the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) which was basically the government version of 401(k).
The health benefits were very, very good, and we had a choice of many plans (I used the postal workers plan, even though I was not a postal worker).
Compare that to the $10,000 deductible Blue Cross plan I have today, as a self-employed person.
And of course, the folks who worked there 20 years had a staggering 8 weeks of vacation a year. That's two months!
So the work is hard, and the pay is only so-so, but all in all, it was not a bad place to work. One could do a lot worse!
Things that worked well for me:
I bought the cheapest house I could find that was still a decent house (only cost me $22,500 back in 1977), and paid it off as soon as I could. I only spent big on critical things like roofs and furnaces. If I could do any fix-up myself, I did. A professional painter offered to paint the trim of my house for six hundred dollars. I did it myself with three cans of paint, less than $100... just took me some time.
When I first started housekeeping, I inherited a lot of old furniture from elderly relatives, so i just cleaned it up and used it. I've bought very little furniture over the last few years. Dumpster dived some of my furniture, and just cleaned it up and painted it. Looks new!
Although I was advised against purchasing them by an A. G. Edwards guy, I'm actually very happy with my EE Savings Bonds. I started buying them after I paid off the house, and some of them are earning 4%, which is better than some of my ill fated mutual funds. They've screwed them up too, though... got rid of the HH bonds, and then placed limits on how many you can purchase in a year. (Although they encourage non-citizens like the Chinese to buy treasuries.)
I was married for three years to a feller who was very reckless with money. And who didn't want to work. Well, I'm too German for that. I would have to be married to someone who would at least meet me halfway on savings.
One lawyer friend of mine created income flow for himself by renting houses.
You are a very resourceful woman! My hat is off to you!
We got a lot of our furniture for free over the years. Cruising Old Town, Alexandria on trash day yielded a number of "finds".
Ironically, some of these things we still have.
And recently, we picked up four nice occasional chairs that were being thrown out at one of the houses in the historic district here on the island.
Maybe I should write an article on found furniture. Much of it is of very good quality.
And yet, many folks go to the furniture store with the loud ads on the radio, buy a lot of trendy, shiny junk (particle board covered with veneer) and then finance it on time.
By the time it is paid for, they end up having to buy more...
As I noted in my Treasury Direct posting, the older bonds were yielding 4%, although I noticed recently that they are yielding less.
You can buy 10-year T-bills on Treasury direct (the online website for the U.S. Treasury) with rates as high as 4%, at least the last time I checked.
Of course, the reason the A.G. Edwards guy didn't want you buying savings bonds was that he didn't get a commission on them!
Smart move also to buy as much house as you needed, not as much as you could afford. As I noted in my house investment posting, a house is just a house, and if you buy more, you just spend more, and in a normal market, the return is about what you put into it.
Sounds like you figured all this out about 30 years before I did!
Some of us are slow learners...
Thank you so kindly for the compliment, but I would suspect that German genes might have had more to do with it than my IQ. My cousin Sharon, who was raised very dysfunctionally and is actually schizophrenic... saved up her money, and paid cash, for her first car.
(We might do many other things stupidly, but we never get in trouble with money.)
Well, gotta give some credit to my parents too, but as my mom says, I "took to my raising".
In buying the cheapest house I could... it still turned out to be more expensive than I thought!
I got out all the payment books, and totalled up what it REALLY cost, after I paid interest... and it was more like $38,000.
See, that's why it doesn't pay to go out looking for debt. It will FIND you.
So nice talking to you! hope I'm not talking your earsies off. I really do enjoy your site, it's a world of education. You're one of the few people I find who seems to think like I do (except you're smarter!) Have a good 'un.....
Post a Comment